I've noticed a lot of smart people building products and raising money to address this space. I'm trying to wrap my head around why there's so much enthusiasm around it at this point in time.
Simon Olson
87 votes by Keith Rabois, Joe Lazarus, Chui Tey, (more)
Believe it or not, I think that this has less to do with photos and more to do with building a social platform.
Why?
Sharing photos is a base activity of the "social" pyramid.
Whether you are looking at Facebook or Orkut, etc., it is one of the most popular activities that users engage in on social networks.
So, if you are going to start building a new "social" platform, you want to start with one of the most popular activities...like photo sharing.
Once users have populated the site, then you can expand into other activities, but initially you want to offer them something that they use/need.
It seems to me like these entrepreneurs have wisely cherry-picked one of the most common activities (photo sharing) in hopes of attracting users and later leveraging the user base to add additional features, ex. social commerce, etc.
So, for example, if Path gains a large number of users, one can imagine access to a user's Path social graph being more valuable than their Facebook social graph.
Why?
Because the user's Path social graph is populated by their "real" or close friends, as opposed to their Facebook social graph which contains a wider web of acquaintances.
Assuming that the social graph will be used for social commerce, the Path social graph will be way more valuable than the Facebook social graph because the trust ratio (used to overcome counter-party risk--arguably the greatest impediment to e-commerce) will be much higher.
Why?
Sharing photos is a base activity of the "social" pyramid.
Whether you are looking at Facebook or Orkut, etc., it is one of the most popular activities that users engage in on social networks.
So, if you are going to start building a new "social" platform, you want to start with one of the most popular activities...like photo sharing.
Once users have populated the site, then you can expand into other activities, but initially you want to offer them something that they use/need.
It seems to me like these entrepreneurs have wisely cherry-picked one of the most common activities (photo sharing) in hopes of attracting users and later leveraging the user base to add additional features, ex. social commerce, etc.
So, for example, if Path gains a large number of users, one can imagine access to a user's Path social graph being more valuable than their Facebook social graph.
Why?
Because the user's Path social graph is populated by their "real" or close friends, as opposed to their Facebook social graph which contains a wider web of acquaintances.
Assuming that the social graph will be used for social commerce, the Path social graph will be way more valuable than the Facebook social graph because the trust ratio (used to overcome counter-party risk--arguably the greatest impediment to e-commerce) will be much higher.
View All 40 Answers • View Answer Change Log
Answer added by Simon Olson.
Believe it or not, I think that this has less to do with photos and more...
Related Answers by Simon
What are the most important lessons entrepreneurs have learned in the first year of their first startup?
A few random thoughts/experiences/obse rvations in no particula... (continue)
Which startups were rejected several times by VCs before getting funded?
Bessemer Ventures has a great "Anti-Portfolio" page where they... (continue)
Answer Stats
- Latest activity Nov 14, 2010.
- This answer has been viewed 513 times.
- Simon has written 249 answers.