This page may be out of date. Submit any pending changes before refreshing this page.
Hide this message.
Quora uses cookies to improve your experience. Read more

What's a good ending for, "Biology is really chemistry. Chemistry is really physics. Physics is really math. Math is really hard."?

This question is primarily intended as a joke.

Questions and answers with this topic are only shown in feed to people who follow the topic.
22 Answers
Anna Demers
Anna Demers, Education Field, Succubus Of Syllables aka I paint with words.
Biology is really chemistry.
Chemistry is really physics.
Physics is really math.
Math is really hard.
Hard is a perception
Perception is fluid
Fluid is your train of thought
Thought is really wordless
Wordless is really an idea
Idea is really abstract
Abstract is really logic
Logic is needed in math
Math then reveals its beauty
Beauty in symbols
Symbols is really a language
Language expresses wordless thoughts
Thoughts go from liquid to solid
Solid is really a method
Method is a way to communicate
Communicate and voilà
Voilà! A new fascinating world reveals itself to you!
Kat Tanaka Okopnik
Kat Tanaka Okopnik, cultural competency coach
Biology is really chemistry.
Chemistry is really physics.
Physics is really math.
Math is really hard.

Hard is just an excuse.
An excuse is not a reason.
A reason is not justification.
Justification is not an answer.

An answer is not the truth.

The truth is not a lie,
...but maybe the cake is.

LET'S EAT!
Ed Caruthers
Ed Caruthers, solid state physicist who worked for DuPont and Xerox
"But reductionism is really wrong."


Because, of course, biology adds much of its own to chemistry.  And chemistry doesn't begin to explain all of biology.

Same is true for Chemistry-Physics and Physics-Math.

So I propose my final line to remind us of the differences between "interesting connections" and "only just the same."
Garrick Saito
Inspirational/motivational ending:

The difficult, we do immediately.
The impossible, will take a little longer.

Humorous ending:

But none of that matters,
If you're going to be an actor
Steve Denton
Steve Denton, Maths & theoretical physics graduate.
I disagree that 'Physics is really Math'.

Physics might be expressed with mathematics, yes, but there is far more to physics than just its mathematical expression. It also requires physical intuition,
which is a kind of sixth sense  - a deep gut-feeling - that a physicist develops, and which enables him to understand and think about the physical world in non-verbal and non-mathematical ways.

It is this intuition that guides a physicist in selecting, out of the myriad possible mathematical theories that might describe some universe or other, the small subset of mathematical theories that might describe our universe - i.e. those that are candidates for a description of our reality. The vast majority of theories that might be mathematically consistent are not consistent with physical reality as we know it - a fact that physicists forget at their peril, as many have done in the past. And if all that was required to develop physics was mathematics, then all mathematicians would be good physicists, and we would have no need for the latter. Happily, this is patently not the case.

And the final statement in the question, 'Math is really hard', is just a subjective opinion. Yes, mathematics is a very demanding discipline, intellectually and academically, for most people, and it takes a long time to study and master. But  there are many other skills that might be just as challenging to master, and therefore justify being described as 'hard' by someone who is unskilled in them, even if they do not make the same intellectual or academic demands as mathematics. (For example, I would love to be able to play the piano to concert performance standard, but know that it would take years of practice - probably as many as required for a mathematics degree, if not more). So I guess my ending would be....

"...Math is really hard,
But then so are a lot of things in life, so man-up and get on with it!" :o)

In a similar vein to the question, a university friend of mine who was studying chemistry used to belittle my subject, theoretical physics, by saying it was 'just hard sums' [1].  My usual riposte to this was the following:

"Chemists are people who don't know enough mathematics to be physicists, and don't know enough Latin to be biologists!" [2]

[1] 'Sums' is an informal term in British English for mathematics, usually at an elementary school level where it is rarely more than arithmetic, and so the term was being used in a (deeply) derogatory sense by my friend.

[2] Apologies to any chemists on the thread :o) (and to biologists - I know that biology requires more than just a grasp of Latin, just as physics requires more than just a grasp of mathematics).
Prashant Juluri
Prashant Juluri, https://soundcloud.com/keywordindia
Biology is really chemistry.
Chemistry is really physics.
Physics is really math.
Math is really hard

And so am I.

The next scene cuts to a guy with unusual tattoo and a girl with really unusual breasts who don't want to study anymore and study each other instead.
John David Ward
John David Ward, child of a retired research scientist and a science teacher
(Expanding on one of the other answers)

Math is really logic
Logic is really philosophy
Philosophy is really philology
Philology is really linguistics
Linguistics is really psychology
Psychology is really anthropology
Anthropology is really biology
Biology is really chemistry
Chemistry is really physics
Physics is really math
Jessica Margolin
Jessica Margolin, BA Physics, MS Materials Science.
Hard is really chemistry.
Chemistry is really physics.
Physics is really math.
Math is really hard.
Hard is really chemistry.
Chemistry is really physics.
Physics is really math.
Math is really hard.
Hard is really chemistry.
Chemistry is really physics.
Physics is really math.
Math is really hard.
Hard is really chemistry.
...